The Nanosecond Battle: How Networks Determine HFT AI Success

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Modern HFT firms are no longer just fast. They are hyper-intelligent, transforming into technology powerhouses that leverage massive AI clusters to predict market movements in volatile, challenging environments. However, imposing these massive AI workloads onto legacy network infrastructures is highly problematic. To truly capitalize on AI, HFT firms require a networking fabric that is as advanced as the algorithms it supports.

Download

Scaling AI Clusters Across Multi-Site Deployments

The evolution of HFT infrastructure

Leading global trading firms now operate at the intersection of finance and supercomputing. While their core business remains trading across equities, futures, options, and cryptocurrencies, their engine room looks increasingly like that of a hyperscaler.

These firms are integrating machine learning (ML) deeply into their operations, utilizing powerful computing clusters to handle data-intensive workloads. This isn’t just about simple regression analysis; it involves running millions of simulations daily across hundreds of global exchanges.

The use cases for these AI clusters are distinct and demanding:

Massive HPC grids: Firms employ grids containing thousands of GPUs and compute nodes. These grids run continuous simulations to back-test strategies against historical data, ensuring resilience before strategies ever touch live markets.
Real-time inference and forecasting: In non-stationary markets, the past does not always predict the future. HFT firms use AI models for time-series forecasting to perform real-time inference on petabytes of alternative and market data.
Accelerated research cycles: Perhaps the biggest competitive advantage is the speed of innovation. A robust AI infrastructure allows researchers to take ideas from concept to production in under 24 hours, rapidly adapting to new market regimes.

Specific demands on the AI fabric

When you combine the volatility of financial markets with the computational heaviness of AI, the pressure on the underlying network fabric becomes immense. Standard data center networking, designed for general-purpose web traffic, often buckles under the following specific constraints.

Hybrid multicast and unicast support

HFT workloads are unique in their traffic patterns. On one hand, the ingestion of market data feeds relies heavily on multicast. A single price update from an exchange must be distributed simultaneously to hundreds of different trading algorithms and inference models to ensure fairness and synchronization. If the network serializes these packets, one model gets the data later than another, rendering its prediction obsolete.

On the other hand, AI training and back-testing generate massive east-west unicast traffic (often using RDMA) between GPUs. The network fabric must handle reliable, high-bandwidth unicast for training while simultaneously managing low-latency multicast for inference – without one traffic type blocking the other.

Low tail latency

In HFT, average latency is a meaningless metric. If a network performs quickly 99% of the time but suffers from jitter or high-latency spikes (tail latency) 1% of the time, that 1% represents millions of dollars in potential losses or regulatory risk. AI workloads are “bursty” by nature; when a training iteration finishes, thousands of GPUs attempt to communicate at once. In a traditional Ethernet network, this causes buffer overflows and packet loss. The resulting retransmissions destroy the predictable performance required for trading.

Non-disruptive scalability

Financial markets do not stop for network maintenance. As HFT firms add more GPUs to improve model accuracy, the network must scale linearly. Traditional chassis-based switches demand a “forklift upgrade” – ripping out old hardware to put in new, larger capacity hardware, which is operationally risky and expensive. HFT firms need an architecture that allows them to add capacity incrementally without disturbing the existing massive flows of data.

Why DriveNets Scheduled Fabric is the Optimal Solution

To solve these contradictions of high throughput vs. low latency and multicast vs. unicast, DriveNets offers a different approach: the DriveNets Network Cloud-AI solution, built on a scheduled fabric architecture.

Unlike traditional Ethernet switches that are lossy by nature, DriveNets’ Fabric-Scheduled Ethernet (FSE) technology offers high predictable performance and low tail latency without the need for advance configuration or complicated traffic management algorithms.

Elimination of congestion

DriveNets Network Cloud-AI employs a scheduled fabric that breaks packets into fixed-size cells. These cells are sprayed evenly across all available paths in the fabric and reassembled at the destination. This ensures that no single link is ever overwhelmed while others sit idle. For HFT firms, this means the network operates with zero packet loss and virtually zero jitter, even under the heaviest AI training loads. This provides the strict, predictable low tail latency that trading algorithms demand.

Support of hybrid traffic

The DriveNets solution is uniquely capable of isolating traffic types. It can support the high-throughput requirements of AI training (unicast) while prioritizing the latency-sensitive market data feeds (multicast). Because the fabric acts as a single logical entity rather than a mesh of independent switches, it can manage multicast distribution far more efficiently, ensuring that market data reaches every compute node simultaneously.

Scalability without compromise

Because the DriveNets solution is software-based and runs on standard Ethernet white boxes (OCP-compliant hardware), HFT firms can scale their AI clusters simply by adding more white boxes. The software automatically recognizes the new capacity and rebalances the load. This scale-out model aligns perfectly with the pay-as-you-grow nature of modern compute clusters, allowing trading firms to expand their high-performance computing (HPC) grids without downtime or complex re-architecting.

The network is strategic to high-frequency trading companies

For high-frequency trading companies, the network is no longer “just plumbing” – it is a strategic asset. As these firms bet their future on AI, they cannot afford to let legacy networking bottlenecks slow down their inference or training cycles.

DriveNets provides the only architecture that mirrors the innovation occurring in the algorithms themselves. By deploying a scheduled, non-blocking, and lossless fabric, HFT firms can ensure that their infrastructure is as fast, smart, and resilient as the markets they trade in.

Key Takeaways

High-frequency trading firms now rely on AI as much as speed, demanding networks that can handle massive, latency-sensitive workloads.
Legacy Ethernet struggles under AI training bursts and real-time market multicast traffic, creating costly tail-latency risks.
DriveNets’ scheduled fabric eliminates congestion and loss, delivering predictable low-latency performance at any scale.
With DriveNets, high-frequency trading firms can expand AI clusters seamlessly and ensure their network matches the intelligence of their algorithms.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes AI-driven HFT workloads uniquely demanding on network infrastructure?

AI-enabled HFT environments combine two extreme and conflicting traffic patterns: multicast market-data distribution that must reach all models simultaneously, and massive east–west unicast traffic generated by GPU training clusters. Legacy networks serialize these flows, causing unfair data distribution, jitter, and congestion—issues that directly impact trading accuracy and profitability.

Why is tail latency more important than average latency in HFT AI clusters?

In HFT, even rare latency spikes (the “tail”) can result in outdated predictions, missed trades, or regulatory risk. AI workloads are bursty—when thousands of GPUs finish an iteration simultaneously, traditional networks suffer buffer overflows and packet loss. This destroys the consistent, predictable performance required for real-time inference and strategy execution.

How does DriveNets’ scheduled fabric help HFT firms scale AI clusters without disruption?

DriveNets uses a software-based, scheduled fabric running on standard white boxes. By slicing traffic into fixed-size cells and evenly spraying them across all paths, the system eliminates congestion while allowing firms to add capacity incrementally. This avoids forklift upgrades and enables continuous, non-disruptive growth of massive GPU grids while maintaining lossless, low-jitter performance.