The Network Can Make or Break the Multi-Tenant HPC/AI cluster

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Organizations are moving toward multi-tenant AI clusters, where multiple teams or departments share a common compute fabric, running heterogeneous AI and HPC workloads. These environments must juggle massive foundation model training, process edge analytics, and run traditional Modeling & Simulation applications,all simultaneously. While GPUs and fast storage get the headlines, the network is the true nervous system of the operation. In a multi-tenant world, the network is either your greatest efficiency enabler or your main bottleneck.

The Core Challenges of Multi-Tenant HPC-AI Networking

Designing a network for a shared AI environment is a complex act of balancing.

To succeed, the fabric must address these fundamental challenges:

• Strict resource isolation: Tenants must be completely isolated from one another to prevent “noisy neighbor” issues. This requires strict traffic separation and predictable performance across the entire fabric, ensuring one user’s heavy workload never degrades another’s.
• Intelligent load balancing: With highly dynamic traffic patterns, the network must intelligently balance loads across tenants. This prevents “hotspots” and ensures fairness, regardless of how many teams are competing for bandwidth.
• Multi-tenancy without overlay overhead: While traditional overlays like VXLAN provide isolation, they add significant complexity and performance “tax” at scale. A native, hardware-level solution is far more efficient for AI workloads.
• Full utilization across all frame sizes: AI workloads generate a volatile mix of large packets (like model checkpoints) and tiny packets (like parameter updates). The network must sustain high utilization across all traffic profiles.
• Universal protocol support: Whether the cluster is running RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCE), standard TCP, or proprietary protocols, the network must maintain consistent, high-tier performance for every traffic type.
• Resilience against suboptimal node allocation: In a busy, shared cluster, tenants are often scheduled on physically distant or “worst-case” nodes. The network must be robust enough to sustain peak performance even in these less-than-ideal scenarios.
• Seamless, hardware-based recovery: AI training jobs can run for weeks, and a single network hiccup can be devastatingly expensive. Fast, hardware-based failover and resiliency are essential to prevent costly job crashes.
• Elastic scaling across sites: As demand grows, clusters must expand across racks, rows, and even different geographies. The network fabric must support this dynamic scaling seamlessly without requiring a total redesign.

Comparing the Networking Technologies

How do current networking technologies handle these demands? Here’s the breakdown:

InfiniBand

• The Good: Ultra-low latency and native RDMA support. It’s the “classic” choice for performance-sensitive workloads.

• The Bad: It’s a closed ecosystem. Scaling beyond a single vendor or data center is notoriously difficult. Isolation often requires clunky software layers at the host level.

Standard Ethernet

• The Good: It’s everywhere. It’s cost-effective, familiar, and interoperable.

• The Bad: It wasn’t built for the “all-out” nature of AI. Packet loss and congestion are common, and “tuning” it for RoCE (RDMA over Converged Ethernet) can feel like a full-time job for a team of experts.

Endpoint-Scheduled Ethernet

• The Good: Uses smart NICs to orchestrate traffic at the server level, improving predictability.

• The Bad: It creates a “marriage” between specific high-end NICs and the network. This coordination adds massive complexity as you scale, making it difficult to maintain in truly diverse multi-tenant environments.

Fabric-Scheduled Ethernet

• The Good: Moves the “brain” into the network fabric itself. It treats the network as a single, intelligent entity that manages traffic flow, ensuring deterministic, lossless performance for both RoCE and TCP.

• The Bad: It requires modern, purpose-built fabric switches rather than legacy hardware.

	InfiniBand	Standard Ethernet (RoCE)	Endpoint-Scheduled Ethernet	Fabric-Scheduled Ethernet
Primary Driver	Performance / Low Latency	Cost / Interoperability	Predictability / Control	Efficiency / Scalability
Multi-Tenancy	Complex (Software-based)	High (Requires overlays)	High (NIC-dependent)	Native (Hardware-based)
Congestion Control	Credit-based	Reactive (PFC/ECN)	Host-managed	Proactive (Credit-based)
Load Balancing	Static/Adaptive Routing	Hashing (Entropy-based)	NIC-coordinated	Cell Spraying (Optimal)
Utilization	High (in single vendor)	Variable (Entropy issues)	High (at complexity cost)	Peak (Regardless of size)
Ecosystem	Closed / Single Vendor	Open / Multi-vendor	Restricted (Specific NICs)	Open Standards / Modern ASICs
Resiliency	Large failure domains	Standard convergence	Coordination-heavy	Fast HW convergence

Which Network Architectures Best Fit Multi-Tenant HPC-AI?

While most modern networking technologies offer some form of resource isolation, they approach the problem from two very different perspectives.

Traditional Architectures (InfiniBand & Standard Ethernet)

These technologies rely on advanced, “bolt-on” functionalities to manage multiple users.

• Mechanism: They utilize partition keys, virtual lanes, and complex congestion control mechanisms to separate traffic.
• The Drawback: These functionalities often struggle to provide truly optimal isolation. They typically come at the cost of additional payload overhead and significantly increased configuration complexity, which becomes harder to manage as the cluster scales.

Fabric-Scheduled Ethernet

Fabric-scheduled Ethernet was designed with multi-tenancy as a core requirement rather than an add-on.

• Mechanism: It includes inherent isolation functionality through the use of multiple egress virtual queues within the fabric itself.
• The Benefit: This architecture provides strict isolation at the hardware level without the “tax” of additional overheads or the need for constant manual tuning.

Feature	Traditional Architectures (InfiniBand & Standard Ethernet)	Fabric-Scheduled Ethernet
Design Philosophy	Rely on advanced, “bolt-on” functionalities to manage multiple users.	Designed with multi-tenancy as a core, native requirement.
Isolation Mechanism	Utilizes partition keys, virtual lanes, and complex congestion control mechanisms to separate traffic.	Includes inherent isolation through multiple egress virtual queues built directly into the fabric.
Operational Impact	Often requires increased configuration complexity and manual tuning as the cluster scales.	Provides strict isolation at the hardware level without the need for constant manual intervention.
Performance “Tax”	Struggles to offer optimal isolation without additional payload overhead.	Delivers high-performance isolation with zero additional overhead.

Load Balancing: The Secret to Full Fabric Utilization

Load balancing is constantly evolving because it directly impacts the bandwidth available to the AI cluster. While traditional hashing methods often leave some links overloaded and others idle, an innovative concept called Cell Spraying (currently exclusive to fabric-scheduled Ethernet) offers a superior approach:

• Unified Cells: It cuts packets into small, uniform cells.
• Spray Distribution: It sprays these cells over all available network links simultaneously.
• Elephant Flow Solution: By distributing data this way, it solves “elephant flow” issues where a single massive stream of data clogs into a single path.
• Zero Tuning: It requires no complex configuration or manual tuning, even when workloads and traffic patterns change dynamically.

The Fabric-Scheduled Ethernet: Advantage

Fabric-scheduled Ethernet architecture provides superior functionality at critical bottlenecks, delivering four key benefits to the modern data center:

• Deterministic, Lossless Fabric: It supports both RoCE and TCP with congestion-aware, lossless forwarding across the entire network.
• Native Multi-Tenancy: It delivers strict isolation without the baggage of overlays or excessive manual tuning through segmentation at the fabric level.
• Full-Fabric Utilization: The architecture natively maximizes throughput and efficiency for any frame size and workload type, from small parameter updates to large checkpoints.
• High Availability and Resilience: It protects against hardware failures through built-in redundancy and fast, hardware-based convergence, ensuring jobs stay running.

The Network Defines HPC-AI Cluster Success

In traditional computing, the network often plays a secondary role. But in AI workloads where thousands of GPUs must synchronize in real-time—the fabric is mission-critical. Consider the rapid compounding of even minor inefficiencies:

• The Cost of Delay: A mere 1-2% slowdown in inter-node communication during deep learning training can translate into hours of lost compute time.
• Compounding Losses: Multiplied across dozens of jobs and thousands of nodes, these delays result in massive wasted expenditure.

In a multi-tenant setting, the stakes are even higher. Poor isolation leads to “noisy-neighbor” disruptions, and network congestion can become systemic, creating cascading delays that stall entire departments. If a cluster fails to scale smoothly, AI innovation is no longer constrained by your algorithms, but by your infrastructure.

The Verdict: Why Fabric-Scheduled Ethernet Wins

Analyzing current networking technologies regarding tenant isolation underscores the distinct advantages of fabric-scheduled Ethernet. It appears to have been specifically designed to offer the exact functionality modern clusters require:

• Perfect Load Balancing: Eliminating hotspots through cell spraying.
• Zero-Overlay Isolation: Maintaining security without performance penalties.
• Universal Utilization: Full performance regardless of frame size or traffic type.
• Resilient Performance: Maintaining peak throughput even under the worst physical node allocation.

The Bottom Line: Networking is the AI Enabler

As AI becomes pervasive and multi-tenant clusters become the norm, the importance of a robust, intelligent network fabric cannot be overstated. Traditional technologies have served their purpose, but they fall short of the demands of modern, elastic environments.

Fabric-scheduled Ethernet stands out as the next-generation solution, turning the network into a catalyst for innovation rather than a constraint.

Key Takeaways

• The Shift to Multi-Tenancy
  The traditional “one cluster, one job” model is becoming obsolete. Organizations are increasingly adopting multi-tenant AI clusters where multiple departments share a single, unified compute fabric to maximize resources.
• Workload Diversity is the New Normal
  Modern infrastructure must be agile enough to handle heterogeneous workloads simultaneously—ranging from massive foundation model training and edge analytics to traditional high-performance modeling and simulation.
• The Network is the “Nervous System”
  While GPUs and high-speed storage often get the most attention, the network is the critical infrastructure component that connects and coordinates the entire operation.
• Avoid the Performance Bottleneck
  In a shared environment, the network is the primary factor that determines success. It can either serve as a powerful efficiency enabler or become the single biggest bottleneck that slows down every tenant.
• Strategic Infrastructure is Crucial
  As AI and HPC applications evolve at “breakneck speeds,” choosing the right networking fabric is no longer just a technical detail—it is a strategic necessity for maintaining a competitive, high-functioning cluster.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the “one cluster, one job” model fading?

As AI and HPC applications diversify at breakneck speeds, dedicated clusters for single jobs have become inefficient and costly. Organizations are moving toward multi-tenancy to allow multiple teams to share a common compute fabric, ensuring higher resource utilization and the ability to run diverse workloads simultaneously.

What are the main risks of a poorly optimized network in a multi-tenant cluster?

A network that isn’t designed for multi-tenancy becomes a major bottleneck. This can lead to “noisy neighbor” issues where one team’s massive foundation model training slows down another department’s edge analytics or simulation tasks, ultimately decreasing the overall ROI of the cluster.

If GPUs are so powerful, why is the network considered the “nervous system”?

While GPUs provide the raw processing power, the network is responsible for the communication between those GPUs, storage, and different user workloads. In a multi-tenant environment, if the network cannot handle the massive data flow or lacks proper isolation, the GPUs will sit idle, making the network the “make or break” component of the system.

 

Transcript

You know, we’re always hearing about the insane GPUs and the massive datasets that are driving this whole AI revolution. But what about the invisible stuff, the infrastructure that connects it all? Today, we are going to focus on the network. The unsung hero that can either make your AI fly or become its biggest bottleneck. It is literally the nervous system of your AI cluster and getting it right is more critical than ever. So let’s dive in. And yeah, this quote just hits the nail on the head. The stakes are incredibly high. You see, in today’s shared AI data centers, the network isn’t just some plumbing, it’s a massive strategic asset. Get it right, you unlock incredible efficiency. Get it wrong, well, you create a huge bottleneck that just grinds innovation to a halt and wastes a ton of very, very expensive resources. So here’s how we’re going to tackle this. First, we’ll talk about the new reality of the AI data center. Then we’ll get into the tough challenges this creates for networking. After that, we’ll compare the main technologies out there, do a deep dive into this really cool concept called cell spraying. And finally, we’ll deliver this strategic verdict on the best way forward.

Okay, first up, the new AI data center. The old way of doing things, you know, dedicating an entire cluster to a single massive job. That model is basically dead. The economics just don’t make sense anymore. No, today it’s all about the multi tenant AI cluster. What that means is you’ve got a single shared fabric that has to juggle everything all at once. We’re talking training, massive foundation models, running real time analytics, and doing complex simulations all at the same time. This kind of chaotic mix creates a super dynamic environment that puts just extreme pressure on the network. And you know, this new world brings a whole new set of fundamental challenges that any network solution absolutely has to solve. It’s this really delicate balancing act between raw performance, keeping users separate from each other, and of course, being able to scale without everything falling apart. And here they are, the eight critical demands. I know it looks like a laundry list, but trust me, every single one of these is a must have. You need ironclad isolation to stop those noisy neighbor problems. You need smart load balancing for traffic you can’t predict. And you need it all without the performance hit you get from old school software overlays. The network’s gotta handle any packet size, support any protocol, recover from failures instantly, and scale like it’s nothing. It’s a really tall order. So the big question Is with a wishlist that demanding, how do the networking technologies out there right now actually stack up? Alright, let’s get into the contenders. We’re gonna take a totally impartial look at the four main approaches on the market, breaking down the good and the bad for each one.

First up, the classic Infiniband. It’s been the go to for high performance computing for a long time and for good reason. It’s got ultra low latency and native RDMA support which lets servers talk to each other without bogging down the cpu. But it has some major downsides for modern AI. It’s a closed single vendor ecosystem which makes it a pain to scale. And trying to isolate tenants means adding these clunky slow software layers on top.

Next is Standard Ethernet. It’s everywhere, right? It’s affordable, it’s interoperable. The problem? It was never ever built for the brutal all out nature of AI workloads. It’s super prone to congestion and trying to tune it for high performance stuff like roch, that’s basically RDMA. Over Ethernet can become a full time job for an entire team of experts. No joke.

Our third contender is something called Endpoint Scheduled Ethernet. The idea here is to use SmartNics to manage traffic right at the server, which makes things more predictable. But, and this is a big but, it essentially marries your servers to a specific high end network card. This tight coupling just adds a massive layer of complexity as you scale, making it an absolute nightmare to manage in a diverse multi tenant setup. Okay, so this table really lays it all out. You can see Infiniband is fast, but it gets super complex with multi tenancy. Standard Ethernet is open, but it’s always reacting to congestion, not preventing it. Endpoint scheduling gives you more control, but it adds a ton of complexity.

But then look at that fourth column fabric, Scheduled Ethernet. It’s native for multi tenancy, proactive on congestion and optimal for load balancing. This points to a fundamentally different and frankly better design. So what makes that last one so special?

Well, let’s zoom in on a key piece of the puzzle. We’re gonna do a quick deep dive on a concept called cell spraying. This is the secret weapon behind that optimal load balancing we just saw. So what on earth is cell spraying? It’s a surprisingly simple yet incredibly powerful idea that’s unique to fabric Scheduled Ethernet. Instead of trying to send a whole big data packet down one path, it chops it up into these tiny uniform pieces called cells. Then it just sprays those cells across every single available network link at the same time. And this is why it’s such a game changer. It takes a massive elephant flow of data, chops it into tiny cells and sprays them perfectly, evenly across every path it can find. This completely eliminates bottlenecks. So no more a single clogged up path. While other links are just sitting there doing nothing. Every part of the network gets used perfectly. And the best part, it’s all automatic zero tuning, zero tweaking. It just works.

Alright, let’s tie this all together for this strategic verdict. Because as we’ve seen this, this isn’t just some technical choice. It’s absolutely mission critical for your entire AI strategy. Let’s talk real world impact. A tiny 1 to 2% network slowdown during a training job doesn’t sound like much, right? Wrong. That translates to hours of lost compute time. Now multiply that across thousands of incredibly expensive GPUs and every single percentage point of inefficiency is like setting fire to a mountain of cash. You’re not just losing time, you are actively burning money. And really, this all comes down to a fundamental difference in design philosophy.

Traditional architectures, they try to bolt on features like isolation after the fact, which just adds complexity and a performance tax. Fabric scheduled Ethernet on the other hand, was designed from the ground up for multi tenancy. Isolation is baked right into the hardware with zero overhead and absolutely no manual tuning needed. So what you get with this native design are four huge a deterministic, lossless fabric for any kind of workload, native multi tenancy for simple rock solid isolation, full fabric utilization because of cell spraying and extreme resilience with super fast hardware based recovery to protect your most important jobs.

So the verdict is pretty clear, isn’t it? For the insane demands of modern multi tenant AI fabric Scheduled Ethernet just stands out. It’s the only solution that was purpose built to accelerate AI innovation, turning the network from a painful constraint into a powerful catalyst. Which leaves us with one final question for you to think about. Is your network a catalyst for innovation? Or is it a constraint that’s quietly holding you back? The answer to that is going to define your success in the age of AI. Thanks for watching.

Related content for AI networking infrastructure

DriveNets AI Networking Solution

Latest Resources on AI Networking: Videos, White Papers, etc

Recent AI Networking blog posts from DriveNets AI networking infrastructure experts